Letter From Birmingham Jail
The text of the letter, plus background information, and comprehension and analysis questions.
Letter From Birmingham Jail
Building Context: In late 1961 and into 1962, Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., helped lead a protest campaign against segregation in Albany, Georgia. Because the police chief had studied King’s writings and did not want to fuel support for his movement. The police arrested and jailed demonstrators but did not beat them. The campaign failed to garner the media attention organizers had hoped would expose injustice.
A few months later, in the spring of 1963, King led similar protests in Birmingham, Alabama, a place King called “the most segregated city in America.” King and other civil rights leaders were arrested for demonstrating. While in jail, he penned a response to an open letter written by eight white ministers denouncing the civil rights demonstrations. King wrote his response in the margins of a newspaper, and it was transcribed into the letter known today as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In that letter, King appealed to American ideals, great thinkers, and natural law to argue for violating unjust segregation laws.
After the letter appeared, the Birmingham police turned violent and brutally beat peaceful demonstrators. The media broadcast the horrifying images to a national audience. In August 1963, King and others spoke to a massive crowd at the Lincoln Memorial in the March on Washington.
Source: Full Letter From Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963
Directions: Read the excerpts and answer the comprehension questions.
Letter Text |
Comprehension Questions |
“I think I should indicate why I am here in Birmingham, since you have been influenced by the view which argues against “outsiders coming in.”” “…I am in Birmingham because injustice is here.” “Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere… Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial “outside agitator” idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.” |
How does King use the idea of justice and equality for all to argue against being an “outsider?” |
“… Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. |
gadfly: a nuisance or annoyance, someone who uses criticism to provoke How does King describe the effectiveness of tension? |
“One of the basic points in your statement is that the action that I and my associates have taken in Birmingham is untimely…We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was “well timed” in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word “Wait!” It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This “Wait” has almost always meant “Never.” We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that “justice too long delayed is justice denied.” …We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights.” |
Why can Blacks no longer wait for equal civil rights? What steps does King argue must be taken? |
“How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law..” “…Let us consider a more concrete example of just and unjust laws. An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal. By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal. Let me give another explanation. A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up that state’s segregation laws was democratically elected? |
Explain the difference between just and unjust laws. |
“Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application. For instance, I have been arrested on a charge of parading without a permit. Now, there is nothing wrong in having an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade. But such an ordinance becomes unjust when it is used to maintain segregation and to deny citizens the First-Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and protest.” |
How does King discuss the different kinds of rights (natural or civil) at play in his arrest? How does King distinguish between a just and unjust law when it comes to the right to peaceable assembly? |
“I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.” |
Describe King’s view on how unjust laws should be violated. |
“Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself, and that is what has happened to the American Negro. Something within has reminded him of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained… So let him march; let him make prayer pilgrimages to the city hall; let him go on freedom rides -and try to understand why he must do so. If his repressed emotions are not released in nonviolent ways, they will seek expression through violence; this is not a threat but a fact of history. |
Why does King argue that oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever? |
“So I have not said to my people: ‘Get rid of your discontent.’ Rather, I have tried to say that this normal and healthy discontent can be channeled into the creative outlet of nonviolent direct action. And now this approach is being termed extremist. But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label… So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice?” |
Explain King’s thoughts about being labeled an “extremist.” |