Skip to Main Content
Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court homework help video thumbnail with a gavel icon and the Bill of Rights Institute logo.
Graphic promoting BRI's Constitutional Conversations on schools, religious liberty, and Tinker v. Des Moines.
Document titled "Students and the Constitution" by Warner Winborne, discussing student rights in relation to free speech.
U.S. Supreme Court building with American flag and cloudy blue sky.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Tinker v Des Moines

8 items

Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court homework help video thumbnail with a gavel icon and the Bill of Rights Institute logo.
Tinker v. Des Moines | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute
Video

Video

3 Min

Why did a subtle act of protest against a foreign war reach the Supreme Court? In 1965, students John and Mary Beth Tinker wore black armbands to school to protest the United States’ involvement in the Vietnam War, despite the Des Moines school district prohibiting such an act. The Tinkers sued the district for violating their First Amendment rights, and the Supreme Court ruled in their favor in a 7-2 decision. While subsequent Supreme Court rulings narrowed the scope of free expression rights at school, Tinker v. Des Moines remains a landmark case that has defined First Amendment rights for students.
3 Min
Graphic promoting BRI's Constitutional Conversations on schools, religious liberty, and Tinker v. Des Moines.
Schools, Religious Liberty & Tinker v. Des Moines | Mark Rienzi | BRI’s Constitutional Conversations
Video

Video

1 Min

Mark Rienzi, President of Becket Law discusses the importance of Tinker v. Des Moines for schools today.
1 Min
U.S. Supreme Court building with American flag and cloudy blue sky.
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Lesson - 4 Activities

Lesson

4 Activities

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines. Dealing with students rights and the First Amendment's protection of free speech, this lesson asks students to evaluate the extent to which the First Amendment should protect symbolic speech, and the degree to which that protection should be guaranteed to students in public schools.