Teacher

Free Classroom Resources

 

Sign Up for Our FREE eLessons!

Our topical eLessons help teachers demonstrate the connection between America’s founding principles and students’ lives. Delivered directly to your inbox, each eLesson includes historical content, classroom activities, discussion questions, and suggestions for further reading. Sign up for all three and receive up-to-date content and resources every week.

Click here to sign up for FREE now!

 
Category: Bill of Rights in the NewsView More Lessons from this Category
Back to Lessons Home
1.07.08 - 8th Amendment and Lethal Injection
Synopsis: On Monday, January 7 the Supreme Court hears arguments about the constitutionality of lethal injection. Lawyers for two inmates in Kentucky will argue that the three-drugs used in lethal injection can cause extreme pain if given improperly. Therefore, they say, it amounts to “cruel and unusual punishment” and violates the Eighth Amendment. This week’s Bill of Rights in the News looks at this important case now before the Court.
Untitled Document Resources

Justices to review lethal injection
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.scotus07jan07,0,2344454.story

High court hears execution debate today
http://www.sptimes.com/2008/01/07/Worldandnation/High_court_hears_exec.shtml

High court to revisit capital punishment
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080106/NATION/191486418&template=nextpage

Discussion Questions

  1. What capital punishment case did the Supreme Court hear on January 7, 2008, and what is at issue in this case?

    The Court heard the case of Baze v. Rees; at issue is the constitutionality of lethal injection as a method of execution.

  2. On what constitutional basis is lethal injection being challenged?

    Lawyers for the Kentucky death row inmates argue that the drugs used in lethal injections violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment because the drugs could cause excruciating pain if not given correctly. They argue that states have not done enough to ensure that execution teams are well trained, increasing the chances for error. They suggest using only one drug—an overdose of anesthetic—which could not cause pain.

  3. On what constitutional basis does the state of Kentucky defend the use of lethal injection?

    Kentucky argues that it has already worked to make the injection process more humane by increasing the amount of anesthetic used. Further, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the prisoners, holding that lethal injection did not violate the Eighth Amendment because it did not create a “substantial risk of wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain.”

  4. Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case result in a ban on the death penalty throughout the US? Why or why not?

    No, the Court will rule only on the constitutionality of this particular method (the three-drug combination used in lethal injection) and not on the death penalty itself. If this method is found unconstitutional, the affected states would be able to enact new laws providing for new or different methods.
  5. Do you believe the three-drug lethal injection violates the Eighth Amendment? Explain.

    Answers will vary.

Extensions

  1. Late in 2007, New Jersey banned the death penalty. Have students locate and summarize newspaper articles about the New Jersey ban, and then argue whether or not they believe the state was right to prohibit the death penalty.

  2. Have students research the last case in which the Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of a death penalty method. In the 1878 case of Wilkerson v. Utah, the Court upheld the constitutionality of a firing squad in Utah (then a territory) for carrying out executions. Have students read the opinion and compare/contrast the facts of the case, as well as the methods used by states to execute prisoners then and now.

    Students can begin their research here:
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=99&invol=130

  3. Have students research other death penalty cases decided by the Supreme Court.
Last Edited On 1/7/2008 2:48:00 PM